Remembering “Lorenzo’s Oil”
Part Two of
Three
By Dave Andrusko
My
wife and I see a fair amount of
films, both old and new, and we
talk about them a lot. Thus when
I happened across the headline
for Telegraph.com columnist
Cristina Odone’s lates
yesterday—“'Lorenzo's Oil' is on
telly tonight. I defy you to
watch my family's story and
support euthanasia”—I was
hooked. I had intended to write
it about it on Thursday, but
time got away from me.
You can read her lovely column
at
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/cristinaodone/100034354/lorenzos-oil-is-on-telly-tonight-i-defy-you-to-watch-my-familys-story-and-support-euthanasia.
I think you will be fascinated
by many of the same things I
was.
In reverse order there were the
online responses. Some were
really vicious. I am obviously
no expert on Great Britain, but
whenever someone seems to write
a life-affirming response to any
difficult situation, the
automatic put down appears to be
that you are a religious fanatic
who cares not a twit about “real
people.” And that applies even
when there is not a whiff of a
specifically religious argument.
On a more uplifting note, there
is the basic story. Turns out
that Lorenzo, the boy at the
center of the 1992 film, is
Odone’s half-brother. Here it is
in one paragraph:
The facts are reproduced
faithfully. When Lorenzo turned
7, this bright and lively little
boy lost every faculty in the
space of a summer. The cause was
adrenoleukodystrophy, a rare
genetic disorder that, doctors
told my father and step-mother,
would kill him within two, maybe
three years. His parents refused
to accept this verdict and,
despite having not so much as a
science A level between them,
began researching the disease
themselves. They discovered an
oil, now called “Lorenzo’s Oil”,
which stopped the dread disease
in its tracks; and, in those
boys who, unlike my brother,
still had all their faculties,
kept them healthy. After initial
scepticism, even the medical
community came round to
recognising the extraordinary
impact of the oil.
(I remember watching George
Miller’s film as though it were
yesterday. Incredible
performances by Nick Nolte and
Susan Sarandon.)
But beyond that, you will love
Ms. Odone’s beautiful ode to
faithfulness and the value of
every human life, even those who
can’t communicate with us. Her
brother, Lorenzo, “was still
very much alive, a loving
presence at the very centre of
our household. (His bed was in
our sitting room – and there was
never any talk of putting him in
a home.) He was constantly cared
for and reminded of how
cherished he was.”
That is an always important
reminder, but especially now
when the skids are being greased
in Great Britain for “assisted
suicide.” I would never idealize
our collective acceptance of
people with disabilities, but
there seems to be an especial
dislike in Great Britain for
people whose “quality of life”
does not measure up to some
arbitrary standard.
Odone’s conclusion warmed my
heart and made my day.
In a culture where the
quality of life is measured by
goods you can buy and the status
you have acquired, Lorenzo seems
a pitiful reminder that we can’t
control everything. But in his
presence such values seemed
worthless. No, he could no
longer score a goal or read “Babar”.
But he gave, and received,
enormous love. If that’s not the
highest quality of life, I don’t
know what is.
Please check out our new blog at
www.nationalrighttolifenews.org
and send your comments to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
Part Three
Part One |