India's Prime Minister Denounces
Sex-Selection Abortion
Editor's note. Please send me any thoughts you may have at
daveandrusko@hotmail.com.
The last thing I would do is to pretend I
know, understand, or grasp the culture of India.
But I don't need to have more than a
passing knowledge to take some hope away from a speech delivered yesterday
by the nation's Prime Minister, denouncing the widespread practice of
sex-selection abortion as a "national shame."
In his first speech addressing the
epidemic of what some dub gendercide, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh warned
of the "alarming" decline in the number of girls. According to census
figures, in 1981 there were 962 girls for every 1,000 boys. By 2001 the
number had dropped to 927. And because of the widespread use of ultrasounds
in recent years, matters have gotten only worse in a society that still
strongly favors boys.
In an inaugural speech delivered at a
national conference dedicated to 'saving the girl child," Singh said, "No
nation, no society, no community can hold its head high and claim to be part
of the civilized world if it condones the practice of discriminating against
one half of humanity represented by women," according to the New York
Times. Singh described female feticide as "inhuman, uncivilized and
reprehensible" at a conference which brought together, doctors, politicians,
and advocates.
The law forbids doctors from revealing
the baby's sex to the parents, but it is widely ignored and infractions are
rarely prosecuted. Singh called for a crackdown on such physicians. "The
patriarchal mindset and preference for male children is compounded by
unethical conduct on the part of some medical practitioners, assisted by
unscrupulous parents, who illegally offer sex-determination services."
According to the Times, while
the practice of sex-selection abortions is most prevalent in more affluent
parts of the country, "special ultrasound clinics have opened even in the
most impoverished parts of the country, where other health care facilities
remain rudimentary."
The magnitude of the tragedy made
possible by inexpensive ultrasound equipment is staggering.
In 2006 the famed British medical
journal, The Lancet, estimated "that as many as 10 million female
fetuses had been aborted in India over the previous 20 years by families
trying to secure male heirs." In India's wealthier regions, a lingering
preference for sons and the kind of wealth which makes it easy to afford
ultrasounds has particularly skewed the sex ratio.
The Times quotes a recent
UNICEF report which concluded, that unless "urgent action" was taken to
reverse this trend, "the social repercussions for future generations could
be devastating."
You can read the Times article
in its entirety at
www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/world/asia/29india.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
|