Euthanasia advocates don't look
past the
suffering to see the person, says disabled leader
Editor’s note. This first
appeared on the blog of John Smeaton, executive director of the
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC).
Alison Davis, the co-ordinator of
No Less Human, a group within SPUC defending the right to life
of the disabled, wrote a very powerful letter published recently
in The Herald. Do read her letter in full on The Herald website
[www.heraldscotland.com/comment/herald-letters/letters-sunday-31-october-2010-1.1064869]
but I leave you with some key quotes, which speak for
themselves:
"Mary
Warnock [ the pro-euthanasia philosopher] makes a fundamental
mistake when she suggests that so long as a bill legalising
euthanasia/assisted suicide has sufficient “safeguards”, sick
and disabled people need not worry that they will be first in
the line of candidates for the lethal dose."
"Would
the Warnocks of this world agree to add a waiting time – 10 or
20 years – to any bill they draw up, in case of a change of
mind? Because human beings are fallible, because life can be
good even with great pain, because nobody knows when doctors’
prognoses will be wrong, it is sheer folly to legalise assisted
suicide for one group of people because they suffer in certain
ways, while spending large amounts of money on “suicide
prevention programmes” to prevent the suicides of others who
suffer in a different way."
"Mary
Warnock’s mistake is that she seems unable to look past the
suffering to see the person, a sad affliction indeed." |