|
On the Cusp of a Massive
Rejection
Editor's note. The following
editorial ran in the October issue of National Right to Life
News.
As I sat down to compose this
editorial I recalled something that once had stopped me in my
tracks. "Some things just have to be believed to be seen."
Who
would have believed in November 2008 that Barack Obama--hailed
by a subservient press as the conquering hero about to usher in
a new era of charismatic presidential leadership--would 22
months later be flailing away desperately attempting to motivate
his base with a soul-sapping combination of chastisement, guilt,
and fear-mongering?
Who would have believed in
November 2008 that our Movement--given up for dead for the
umpteenth time--would come roaring back to life in less than two
years? Who would have anticipated that a boatload of pro-life
candidates--knowing full well that their every syllable would be
distorted, every word misrepresented, and every sentence taken
out of context--would nonetheless be unafraid to frankly state
their convictions?
Who would have believed in
November 2008 that the very social network mechanism Obama used
to turbo-charge his campaign would be adopted by pro-life forces
to grow and multiply and succor our cause? That what he meant
for evil we use for good?
Who would have thought that the
pro-life "damage report" for the first two years would be
"perhaps less extensive than many would have predicted in early
2009, given the expansive pro-abortion policies to which the
newly elected president had previously committed himself, and
the lopsided Democratic majorities in Congress," as the story on
page 3 shrewdly explains.
All these things came to pass not
by accident but because you understood that "Some things just
have to be believed to be seen." That is why ...
You refused to complain. You
refused to make excuses. You refused to budge. You refused to
quit. Even in those early dark hours, you could see what would
come to pass but if only you held fast.
At this juncture, President
Obama's popularity--which once soared to the mid- to high 60s
range--has come crashing to earth. The electorate still cuts him
slack as a human being, but find his policies not only
completely at odds with what a center-right nation believes in
but also threatening to our core values.
None of this impending rejection
makes a lot of sense unless we recall that if ever there was a
stealth presidential candidate, it was Obama. He cruised to
victory on a platform whose foundation of "hope" was as
meaningless as it was persuasive for 53% of the electorate.
Fast-forward to early September
when Obama was (according to Washington Post columnist Michael
Gerson) "Self-pitying," "Snappish," "Humorless," and "Negative."
Was it just a crummy economy and worse poll numbers? No.
Stripped of the mystique by the
everyday duties of the presidency, Obama stood revealed for what
he is, and has always been: a pedestrian, big-government liberal
in the pocket of the Abortion Establishment. And that do not
make Obama happy.
Equally obvious, although Gerson
was too kind to make the point, when separated from his
teleprompter, Obama borders on incoherence. Whoever wrote those
elegant speeches in 2007 and 2008 must have taken a long-term
sabbatical.
From our single-issue point of
view, ObamaCare is most revealing because it embodies Obama's
abiding faith in Big Government and has set up him--and his
party--for big trouble. Here's the operative paragraph in
Gerson's column:
"But Obama's problem is deeper
than his economic challenges. His policies as
president--particularly the creation of a health entitlement and
his Rooseveltian emphasis on federal spending to create
public-sector jobs--have reopened and widened the main partisan
division in American political life. ...
"They are not only unpopular;
they have made it impossible for him to maintain the pretense of
being a unifying, healing, once-in-a-generation leader. It is
the agenda that undermined the idiom."
The larger context in which this
rests should not be missed. ObamaCare is an electoral guillotine
for Democrats running in November because it embodies the
top-down mentality that is embedded in the DNA of his party's
approach to governance; was passed over the vocal opposition of
a majority of the American people; opens governmental sluices,
flooding the Abortion Industry with rivers of money; and was
sold with lies and transparent falsehoods.
All these chickens--and a
henhouse full of other ones--are coming home to roost.
Please send your comments on
Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com.
If you like, join those who are following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha.
|