Euthanasia Mass Grave Grim
Reminder That Human
Exceptionalism Necessary For “Never Again”
By Wesley J. Smith
Editor’s note. This appears on
Wesley’s terrific blog at
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2011/01/13/euthanasia-mass-grave-grim-reminder-that-human-exceptionalism-necessary-for-never-again.
The famous article by Leo Alexander that Wesley quotes from can
be read in its entirety at
http://www.ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/MSDICTAT.TXT.
The
opening movement of the Holocaust targeted infants with
disabilities first, and then adults in the notorious T-4
program. Between 1939-1945, German doctors and other health care
professionals willingly killed hundreds of thousands of people
with disabilities--not because they were ordered to by Nazis,
but because they believed in eugenics and considered their work
a “healing treatment” for the killed patient, the family, and
society.
Now, a grim reminder of that
carnage has been found near a mental hospital where such
killings may have taken place. From the story: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/04/nazi-euthanasia-victims-austria-hall]:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A hospital graveyard in
Austria has been found to contain the remains of what are
believed to be Nazi euthanasia victims, authorities said today.
Preliminary building work on the site in Hall, the Tyrol
province in western Austria, was halted as a search began to
trace the identities of the victims and their families. Oliver
Seifert, a historian who recently found documents relating to
the graveyard, in which around 220 patients of the psychiatric
institute in Hall are believed to have been buried between 1942
and 1945, told a press conference today that many questions
remained unanswered. “At this stage we can’t say that all 220
people were victims of the Nazi euthanasia programme but one of
the central questions we will be looking into is how they died,”
he said.
He added that his discovery of
the documents, during a reorganisation of the hospital archives,
showed the death rate of patients at Hall went up considerably
towards the end of the war, despite the fact that the
institution was not officially part of the Nazis’ euthanasia
programme, under which tens of thousands of people with
disabilities were killed. The graves may throw light on the way
in which euthanasia as a policy was decentralised and, even
without orders from on high, became systematic in many
psychiatric institutions across the Third Reich whose head
doctors bought into the Nazi belief that people with mental
disorders were unworthy of life.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note the quote, “even without
orders.” No doctor was forced to commit euthanasia under Nazi
Germany (although doctors and midwives were required to report
the birth of babies with disabilities). The killers were eager
to do so, and indeed, the euthanasia rampage continued for a
time even after the war was over.
Once we decide that some human
beings have lesser value than other human beings, it ceases to
become a question so much of whether we will oppress,
discriminate, or even, kill them, but what form the
invidiousness will take.
That was certainly the big lesson
that the Nuremberg Medical Trials taught us. In 1949, Dr. Leo
Alexander, the chief medical investigator wrote in the New
England Journal of Medicine words prophetic words that we must
never forget. From “Medical Science Under Dictatorship:”
Whatever proportions these
crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who
investigated them that they had started from small beginnings.
The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis
in the basic attitudes of the physicians. It started with the
acceptance of the attitude, basic to the euthanasia movement,
that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived.
This attitude in its early stages concerned itself merely with
the severely and chronically sick. Gradually the sphere of those
to be included in this category was enlarged to encompass the
socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially
unwanted and finally all non-Germans.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Looking at the state of the 1949
culture of American medicine, Dr. Alexander then warned:
In an increasingly utilitarian
society these patients [with chronic diseases] are being looked
down upon with increasing definiteness as unwanted ballast. A
certain amount of rather open contempt for the people who cannot
be rehabilitated with present knowledge has developed. This is
probably due to a good deal of unconscious hostility, because
these people for whom there seem to be no effective remedies,
have become a threat to newly acquired delusions of omnipotence.
. . . At this point, Americans should remember that the enormity
of the euthanasia movement is present in their own midst.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That is now coming true. We see
renewed advocacy for the ethical propriety of infanticide–and
disabled babies are being killed today in the Netherlands.
Eugenic abortion abounds. Euthanasia of the sick and disabled is
happening–mostly “voluntary,” but also non voluntary.
Dr. Alexander warned us. Death
camps and authoritarianism are not necessary to open the door to
evil–as the USA eugenics movement showed. Human exceptionalism
is the padlock on that dark door. Never again. |