|
Abortionist Gosnell: “It should
have taken only one look”
By Dave Andrusko
The impact of abortionist/alleged
murderer Kermit Gosnell continues to spread, like ripples on a
pond. In this case what stirred the water was charges by a
furious Philadelphia Grand Jury that Gosnell and several of his
untrained, unlicensed staff were responsible for the murders of
Karnamaya Mongar and seven born-alive babies who were killed
when their spines were snipped.
What do I mean? A friend asked me
if the “mainstream” press responded in its usual ho-hum manner
when Philadelphia Attorney District Attorney Seth Williams held
a press conference to announce what the Grand Jury had concluded
in its 261-page report. With the exception of the incorrigible
editorial page of the New York Times, most outlets “got it.”
What Gosnell is charged with is so grotesque it sheers away all
but the most battle-tested pro-abortion armor. Something MUST be
done to reign in the likes of Gosnell's Women's Medical Society
in West Philadelphia.
I thought of that yesterday when
I read an editorial in the News Journal of Delaware. (Gosnell
piled his trade one day a week in Delaware.)
The first half was boiler-plate
abortion apologetics. Then, out of the blue, it was as if the
two sides of the writer’s brain made contact.
After telling us that abortion is
practically as American as apple pie, “That said, Delawareans
should have the assurance that abortions done here are carried
out in a civilized, sterile and professional manner. Abortion
clinics should be inspected and cleared by state authorities.”
The editorial then added, “But apparently, Delaware has never
had any standards for approving abortion facilities.”
To be clear, having “standards,”
or having in place layers of regulatory agencies, from the state
on-down is not assurance that the atrocities Gosnell is charged
with committing won’t take place. There needs to be a will, a
commitment to assuring that abortion clinics are not
inspection-free zones.
That is precisely what was
lacking in Pennsylvania. Second only to the Grand Jury’s anger
at Gosnell is its rage that authorities did nothing, even though
there was an abundance of evidence that the clinic was a filthy
pit that preyed on poor women of color with a cavalier disregard
for their safety.
As the Grand Jury put it
perfectly, “It should have taken only one look.” |