|
Obama and "60 Minutes"
By Dave Andrusko
There
are so many things going on that it's not often that I get to
see an event live; I usually hear it later on C-SPAN radio or
watch it online. Not so with President Obama's interview with 60
Minutes' Steve Kroft which aired yesterday. That one I cleared
the decks to see.
If we were not a single-issue
organization, there would be a hundred different points of
obfuscation that would warrant cleaning up. But there was still
plenty for pro-lifers who watched the President on Sunday.
Kroft alternated fairly tough
questions with "here-can-I-help-you?" excuse-lines that the
President would appropriate for himself. Here are some
highlights.
Obama's all-purpose excuse was
that he was in such a hurry that sometimes things got done in a
way that violated some of his promises--such as to "make sure
that the key negotiations around health care were on C-SPAN"
(which he admitted to)--and freezing out Republicans (which he
did not fess up to). In fact it was clear that in Obama's mind
the trouble derived not from doing everything behind closed
doors free of Republicans, but that they did not agree with what
the leadership came out of their closed caucuses and presented
as "take it or leave it" to the GOP.
He went out of his way to deny
that he was a "traditional, big government liberal." Globbling
up the brunt of the health care system (a sixth of the entire
economy) was only "because we were in such a rush to get this
stuff done."
There was a clear suggestion that
he didn't see the repudiation coming. (In fact, Obama several
times avoided admitting the election was a referendum on him and
his agenda.) He did acknowledge that he knew that ObamaCare
might hurt (although perhaps not how much), but that he took it
on the chin for the good of the nation.
"So, ultimately, I had to make a
decision: do I put all that aside, because it's gonna be bad
politics?" Obama said. "Or do I go ahead and try to do it
because it will ultimately benefit the country? I made the
decision to go ahead and do it.
And it proved as costly
politically as we expected. Probably actually a little more
costly than we expected, politically."
Costly not, you understand,
because ObamaCare is deeply flawed--loaded down with
abortion-enhancing provisions and guarantees that we will result
in the rationing of medically necessary care-- but "partly"
because "I couldn't get the kind of cooperation from Republicans
that I had hoped for."
One other illustration. Although
the decision had nothing to do with our concerns, Obama's
explanation for why he did it speaks volumes.
"Well, I decided to sign the
bill. Now, that's an example of where I was so concerned about
getting things done that, you know, I lost track of part of the
reason I got elected. Which was we were gonna change how
business was done here. And, you know, each one of those
decisions may be justifiable in isolation, but cumulatively I
think what people started feeling was, 'Gosh, this is sort of
business-as-usual in Washington.' And that's part of what I ran
against."
Obama wants the benefits of
portraying himself as an outsider, a kind of Jefferson Smith,
who came to clean up Washington but who was temporarily
sidetracked by the complications and complexity of governing.
And don't forget:
That Democrats fell like ten pins
November 2 had nothing to do with Obama or ObamaCare.
If you believe that, you'll
believe anything.
Please send your comments on
Today's News & Views and National Right to Life News Today to
daveandrusko@gmail.com. If you like, join those who are
following me on Twitter at
http://twitter.com/daveha. |