Abortion foes in US push for ultrasound legislation
The
Associated Press
Saturday, June 16, 2007
KANSAS CITY, Missouri:
A national anti-abortion group is pushing legislation in U.S.
states aimed at making sure pregnant women and girls view
sonograms before having abortions, hoping that what they see
will persuade them against having the procedure.
Such proposals have gained little attention so
far from lawmakers in Kansas or Missouri. But the National Right
to Life Committee says 11 states have enacted laws requiring
abortion providers to tell patients they have the right to see
an ultrasound image of the embryo or fetus they are carrying.
Right to Life had its annual, three-day
convention in Kansas City this week, attracting more than 1,000
leaders of local and state anti-abortion groups from across the
nation. Mary Balch, director of the group's state legislative
efforts, predicted that ultrasound legislation will be a growing
trend.
"We believe the more information a woman has
about the development of a child, the more likely she is to
choose life," Balch said during an interview.
Critics see such legislation as an attempt by
anti-abortion activists to have the state interfere in decisions
between patients and doctors.
"It's her pregnancy. It's her decision. It's
part of her health care. A decision to have an abortion is very
personal, very private, very close to the heart," said Julie
Burkhart, lobbyist for the Kansas abortion rights group ProKanDo.
This year, the Kansas House's Federal and
State Affairs Committee sponsored a bill requiring abortion
providers to give patients the option of having a sonogram and,
if the patients can't afford it, have the state pick up the
cost. The measure was assigned to a second committee, where it
didn't have a hearing, but it remains alive for the 2008
session.
In Missouri, a proposal from Republican Rep.
Jane Cunningham went even further. It would have required the
abortion provider to show the sonogram to the patient before the
procedure. However, her bill died without a hearing.
Balch and other Right to Life leaders said
abortion opponents are interested in such legislation because
they believe patients do not receive enough information about
abortion procedures.
"We want this kind of information before we
make this permanent, life-or-death decision," said Olivia Gans,
who had an abortion in the early 1980s and now directs Right to
Life's American Victims of Abortion project.
But Burkhart said abortion providers routinely
use ultrasound equipment and already show images to patients who
ask to see them.
She called the ultrasound bills "just another
way in which to control women."
"It's another way in which the right wing
really works to mislead the public in making them believe that
somehow abortion providers are substandard health care
providers, and that is not true," she said.