![]() |
|
FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON MEDICARE RATIONING, CLICK ON THE LINKS BELOW: “How Medicare Was Saved from Rationing – And Why It’s Now in Danger”
COVERING THE UNINSURED WITHOUT RATIONING
The
Pro-Life Postition on Medicare
Affording
Healthcare without Rationing Drug Price
Controls |
Government-imposed denial of life-saving medical treatment is a form of involuntary euthanasia. Because Medicare is mandatory health insurance for older Americans, the government must not limit the ability of senior citizens to use their own money, if they wish, to get unrationed insurance for life-saving medical treatment under Medicare. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE AND ACTION ALERT In the context of
reauthorizing and expanding the children’s health
insurance program known by the acronym SCHIP, the House of Representative
initially passed a bill, known as the CHAMP Act, that contained
provisions that effectively end the private
fee-for-service alternative in Medicare that now
gives older Americans the legal right to add their own money, if
they choose, on top of the government contribution in order to obtain
health insurance less likely to ration
life-saving treatment (see below.) Ultimately, the House leadership
instead agreed to go forward with a slightly modified Senate version
of the SCHIP re-authorization that did not include
these or any other provisions related to Medicare,
and NRLC took a neutral position on subsequent SCHIP
votes. However, in turn, the Senate leadership agreed that the
Senate would develop and consider a separate
Medicare bill that would avert scheduled cuts in
physician reimbursement under government fee-for-service
Medicare and possibly make other changes like those in the CHAMP
Act. Such legislation is currently under
development in the Senate Finance Committee. Note: The
specific provisions are identified and explained in the
NRLC –Because of
post-9-11 security screening requirements, postal mail, to be –You can send an
e-mail by going to www.nrlc.org, clicking
on Legislative –You can call your
Representative’s and Senators’ state offices (see local
NRLC Letter to
Members of U.S. House of Representatives on
NRLC Letter to
U.S. Senators on SCHIP -- July 30,
2007 Basic Background: • Since its inception, the National Right to Life Committee has been committed to protecting the right to life from conception until natural death, which means that we have fought just as strongly against infanticide and euthanasia as against abortion. In particular, we have strongly opposed involuntary denial of life-saving medical treatment through rationing. • Medicare, the mandatory government program that since the1960's has provided health insurance for older Americans, is in deep trouble. It is paid for largely by payroll and income taxes, through which workers essentially pay for health care costs of retirees. When the baby boom generation retires, the proportion of retirees to workers will rise dramatically, so that there will be less tax money available for each retiree, imperiling the ability of Medicare to continue to provide unrationed health care to senior citizens. The economic reality is that in order to provide Medicare coverage for the baby boom generation as it retires, without unrealistic massive future tax increases, government payments per beneficiary will not be able to keep up with medical inflation. If the funds available for health care for senior citizens from all sources are so limited, the only possible result will be rationing. Since senior citizens are required to participate in Medicare, this would amount to government-imposed involuntary euthanasia. • Under the Medicare as it now exists, there is an escape valve–an alternative to rationing that does not either break the budget or require new taxes. That alternative – the private fee-for-service option – permits those eligible for Medicare voluntarily to supplement government payments for health insurance premiums with their own funds, if they wish, in order to obtain unrationed insurance. Most critically, it provides that government officials cannot impose rationing-causing price controls. • The private fee-for-service alternative is now under assault in Congress. It is critically important to turn back this assault to protect senior citizens from the treat of government-imposed health care rationing, which is a form of involuntary euthanasia. OLDER AMERICANS MUST REMAIN FREE TO SPEND THEIR OWN MONEY TO SAVE THEIR OWN LIVES ! |
|