![]() |
|
National Right to Life statement
on the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist
What follows is a
press release from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) in
Washington, D.C., issued on Sunday, September 4, 2005, at 12:30 AM
EDT. For further information, call (202) 626-8825, or send e-mail
to legfederal@nrlc.org.
WASHINGTON --
Following the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist Saturday
evening, the following statement was issued by the National Right to
Life Committee (NRLC) in Washington, D.C..
"Millions of
pro-life Americans mourn the death of Chief Justice Rehnquist," said
NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson. "He dissented from the
Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion on demand in 1973. He
consistently voted to allow elected lawmakers to decide when and how
to protect unborn human life, most recently as one of four
dissenting justices who said that states should be allowed to ban
partial-birth abortion." (Stenberg v. Carhart, 2000)
Rehnquist was
the last remaining member of the Supreme Court that handed down Roe
v. Wade in 1973. He was one of the two dissenters in that case,
writing that the Court's doctrine on abortion "is far more
appropriate to a legislative judgment than to a judicial one," and,
"To reach its result, the Court necessarily has had to find within
the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently
completely unknown to the drafters of the Amendment."
Rehnquist also
dissented when the Court reaffirmed Roe in the 1992 case of Casey v.
Planned Parenthood. In that dissent, he urged that the Court
abandon Roe and thereby leave the matter in the hands of elected
lawmakers. He chided the Court plurality for justifying the ruling
on grounds of "stare decisis" (precedent), writing, "Our
constitutional watch does not cease merely because we have spoken
before on an issue; when it becomes clear that a prior
constitutional interpretation is unsound we are obliged to reexamine
the question. . . . [Otherwise] the most outlandish constitutional
decision could survive forever . . ."
With Rehnquist's
death, the current Supreme Court is divided 6 to 2 in favor of Roe
v. Wade -- that is, in support of the doctrine that abortion must be
allowed for any reason until "viability" (about five and one-half
months), and for "health" reasons (broadly defined) even during
the final three months of pregnancy. To see a refutation of the
myth that the Court has been divided 5 to 4 on Roe, see the analysis
by the Annenberg Center's FactCheck.org here:
http://www.factcheck.org/article176.html
However, the
Court has been divided 5-4 in favor of partial-birth abortion --
Rehnquist voted to allow states to prohibit the method, while
Justice O'Connor voted to say that Roe v. Wade prevented bans on
partial-birth abortion. (Stenberg v. Carhart, 2000)
National Right
to Life is the nation's largest pro-life organization, with 50 state
affiliates and approximately 3,000 local affiliates nationwide.
NRLC works through legislation and education to protect those
threatened by abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, and assisted
suicide.
To return to the main page on Judicial Nominations, click
here. |