|
To return to the Free Speech Index
Page, click here.
To return to the NRLC Home Page, click
here.
To view or
download a pdf version of this letter, click
here.
The following letter was sent by the National Right to Life
Committee to members of the U.S. House of Representatives on June
28, 2007, in support of the Pence Amendment to prohibit the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) from restoring the so-called
"Fairness Doctrine" governing broadcast communications.
Later that day, the House adopted the Pence Amendment, 309-115.
Dear Member of Congress:
The House will today consider an amendment to the Financial
Services Appropriations bill (H.R. 2829), to be offered by Mr.
Pence (co-sponsored by Mr. Flake and Mr. Hensarling), to bar the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from spending money
to revive the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" or any regulation
with the same substance.
The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) supports the Pence
Amendment, and urges you to vote for it. The recently evident
campaign to revive the "Fairness Doctrine" is yet another
attempt by some political interests to subdue the voices of
those with opposing viewpoints. It has much in common with
recent legislative efforts to regulate communications to the
public about what is going on in Congress (so-called "grassroots
lobbying"), which were rejected earlier this year by both the
Senate and by the House Judiciary Committee.
The "Fairness Doctrine" required broadcasters to air opposing
viewpoints on controversial issues. In 1987, the FCC repealed
the Doctrine, recognizing that it could no longer withstand
scrutiny under the First Amendment. Before the repeal, the
Doctrine was manipulated by various political actors for the
purpose of inhibiting rather than enhancing political debate.
As George F. Will recounted in
a recent column:
The effect of re-imposing the "Fairness Doctrine" would be
predictable: Many broadcasters would drop programs which
advocate a point of view on a controversial issue or issues.
For example, National Right to Life distributes a five-minute
daily radio program called "Pro-Life Perspective," which is
broadcast on nearly 200 radio stations, most of them religiously
affiliated. The program takes a strong pro-life position on
issues such as abortion, human cloning, and euthanasia. If most
of these station owners are told by the government that they
risk their licenses by broadcasting "Pro-Life Perspectives"
unless they also broadcast a five-minute daily program that
promotes abortion, human cloning, and euthanasia, then they will
broadcast no program at all commenting on these issues.
When the Doctrine was first issued by the FCC in 1949, its
advocates claimed that it did not offend the First Amendment
because the public was dependant upon information from a very
limited number of government-licensed broadcast outlets. In
today's world of multitudinous channels of AM and FM radio, the
satellite radio services, the Internet (including Internet
access to countless radio stations), hundreds of channels of
television, etc., this justification is entirely unpersuasive.
We urge you to reject the counsel of those who would put the
government in the business of regulating the content of
political speech, and support the Pence-Flake-Hensarling
Amendment.
Sincerely,
Douglas Johnson
Legislative Director
National Right to Life Committee
512-10th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
http://www.nrlc.org/FreeSpeech/index.html
To return to the Free Speech Index Page, click here.
To return to the NRLC Home Page, click
here.
|