|
To view or
download the PDF document of this bill, click
here.
To return to
the main index on the "Freedom of Choice Act," click
here.
To return to
the NRLC home page, click here.
Freedom of Choice Act (Introduced
in Senate)
S 1173 IS
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1173
To protect, consistent with
Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a
child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE
UNITED STATES
April 19, 2007
Mrs. BOXER (for a current list of
co-sponsors, click here) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To protect, consistent with
Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a
child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate
and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the
`Freedom of Choice Act'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States was
founded on core principles, such as liberty,
personal privacy, and equality, which ensure
that individuals are free to make their most
intimate decisions without governmental
interference and discrimination.
(2) One of the most private
and difficult decisions an individual makes
is whether to begin, prevent, continue, or
terminate a pregnancy. Those reproductive
health decisions are best made by women, in
consultation with their loved ones and
health care providers.
(3) In 1965, in Griswold v.
Connecticut (381 U.S. 479), and in 1973, in
Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113) and Doe v. Bolton
(410 U.S. 179), the Supreme Court recognized
that the right to privacy protected by the
Constitution encompasses the right of every
woman to weigh the personal, moral, and
religious considerations involved in
deciding whether to begin, prevent,
continue, or terminate a pregnancy.
(4) The Roe v. Wade decision
carefully balances the rights of women to
make important reproductive decisions with
the State's interest in potential life.
Under Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, the
right to privacy protects a woman's decision
to choose to terminate her pregnancy prior
to fetal viability, with the State permitted
to ban abortion after fetal viability except
when necessary to protect a woman's life or
health.
(5) These decisions have
protected the health and lives of women in
the United States. Prior to the Roe v. Wade
decision in 1973, an estimated 1,200,000
women each year were forced to resort to
illegal abortions, despite the risk of
unsanitary conditions, incompetent
treatment, infection, hemorrhage,
disfiguration, and death. Before Roe, it is
estimated that thousands of women died
annually in the United States as a result of
illegal abortions.
(6) In countries in which
abortion remains illegal, the risk of
maternal mortality is high. According to the
World Health Organization, of the
approximately 600,000 pregnancy-related
deaths occurring annually around the world,
80,000 are associated with unsafe abortions.
(7) The Roe v. Wade decision
also expanded the opportunities for women to
participate equally in society. In 1992, in
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (505 U.S. 833),
the Supreme Court observed that, `[t]he
ability of women to participate equally in
the economic and social life of the Nation
has been facilitated by their ability to
control their reproductive lives.'.
(8) Even though the Roe v.
Wade decision has stood for more than 34
years, there are increasing threats to
reproductive health and freedom emerging
from all branches and levels of government.
In 2006, South Dakota became the first State
in more than 15 years to enact a ban on
abortion in nearly all circumstances.
Supporters of this ban have admitted it is
an attempt to directly challenge Roe in the
courts. Other States are considering similar
bans.
(9) Further threatening Roe,
the Supreme Court recently upheld the
first-ever Federal ban on an abortion
procedure, which has no exception to protect
a woman's health. The majority decision in
Gonzales v. Carhart (05-380, slip op. April
18, 2007) and Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood
Federation of America fails to protect a
woman's health, a core tenet of Roe v. Wade.
Dissenting in that case, Justice Ginsburg
called the majority's opinion `alarming',
and stated that, `[f]or the first time since
Roe, the Court blesses a prohibition with no
exception safeguarding a woman's health'.
Further, she said, the Federal ban `and the
Court's defense of it cannot be understood
as anything other than an effort to chip
away at a right declared again and again by
this Court'.
(10) Legal and practical
barriers to the full range of reproductive
services endanger women's health and lives.
Incremental restrictions on the right to
choose imposed by Congress and State
legislatures have made access to
reproductive care extremely difficult, if
not impossible, for many women across the
country. Currently, 87 percent of the
counties in the United States have no
abortion provider.
(11) While abortion should
remain safe and legal, women should also
have more meaningful access to family
planning services that prevent unintended
pregnancies, thereby reducing the need for
abortion.
(12) To guarantee the
protections of Roe v. Wade, Federal
legislation is necessary.
(13) Although Congress may
not create constitutional rights without
amending the Constitution, Congress may,
where authorized by its enumerated powers
and not prohibited by the Constitution,
enact legislation to create and secure
statutory rights in areas of legitimate
national concern.
(14) Congress has the
affirmative power under section 8 of article
I of the Constitution and section 5 of the
14th amendment to the Constitution to enact
legislation to facilitate interstate
commerce and to prevent State interference
with interstate commerce, liberty, or equal
protection of the laws.
(15) Federal protection of a
woman's right to choose to prevent or
terminate a pregnancy falls within this
affirmative power of Congress, in part,
because--
(A) many women cross
State lines to obtain abortions and many
more would be forced to do so absent a
constitutional right or Federal
protection;
(B) reproductive health
clinics are commercial actors that
regularly purchase medicine, medical
equipment, and other necessary supplies
from out-of-State suppliers; and
(C) reproductive health
clinics employ doctors, nurses, and
other personnel who travel across State
lines in order to provide reproductive
health services to patients.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) GOVERNMENT- The term
`government' includes a branch, department,
agency, instrumentality, or official (or
other individual acting under color of law)
of the United States, a State, or a
subdivision of a State.
(2) STATE- The term `State'
means each of the States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
and each territory or possession of the
United States.
(3) VIABILITY- The term
`viability' means that stage of pregnancy
when, in the best medical judgment of the
attending physician based on the particular
medical facts of the case before the
physician, there is a reasonable likelihood
of the sustained survival of the fetus
outside of the woman.
SEC. 4. INTERFERENCE WITH
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH PROHIBITED.
SEC. 5. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, or
the application of such provision to any person
or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional,
the remainder of this Act, or the application of
such provision to persons or circumstances other
than those as to which the provision is held to
be unconstitutional, shall not be affected
thereby.
SEC. 6. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.
This Act applies to every
Federal, State, and local statute, ordinance,
regulation, administrative order, decision,
policy, practice, or other action enacted,
adopted, or implemented before, on, or after the
date of enactment of this Act.
|
To view or download the
PDF document of this bill, click here.
To return to the main
index on the "Freedom of Choice Act," click here.
To return to the NRLC home
page, click here.
|