To go to the Abortion in Health Care
index, click here.
To go to the NRLC Home page, click
here.
To go to the NRLC Legislative Action Center, click
here. |
| To view or
download a November 20, 2009 letter from
the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
to the Senate, condemning the abortion
language in the Reid bill, click
here. |
|
For immediate release:
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
For further information:
Federal Legislation Department 202-626-8820,
legfederal@aol.com,
or visit
http://www.nrlc.org/ahc
National Right to Life Committee
Rejects Reid Abortion Funding Language as "Completely
Unacceptable," Calls for Enactment of Stupak-Pitts
Amendment
WASHINGTON (November 18, 2009) -- The
following statement was issued by the National Right to
Life Committee (NRLC), the federation of right-to-life
organizations in all 50 states, and may be attributed to
NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.)
has rejected the bipartisan Stupak-Pitts Amendment and
has substituted completely unacceptable language that
would result in coverage of abortion on demand in two
big new federal government programs.
Reid seeks to cover elective abortions in
two big new federal health programs, but tries to
conceal that unpopular reality with layers of contrived
definitions and hollow bookkeeping requirements.
Rep. Lois Capps (D-Ca.), who has a 100%
pro-abortion voting record, said in a press release
following release of the Reid language: "It appears that
their approach closely mirrors my language which was
originally included in the House bill." The Capps
language referred to was opposed by NRLC and other
pro-life organizations and was deleted by the House by a
vote of 240-194 on November 7, as 64 Democrats (one
fourth of all House Democrats), along with 176
Republicans, voted to replace it with the Stupak-Pitts
Amendment.
The Stupak-Pitts Amendment would prevent
federal subsidies for abortion by applying the
principles of longstanding federal laws such as the Hyde
Amendment to the new programs created by the health care
legislation. Those principles prohibit both direct
funding of abortion procedures, and subsidies for plans
that cover elective abortions, in existing federal
programs such as Medicaid, the Federal Employees Health
Benefits Program, and the military.
Regrettably but predictably, Reid
rejected the bipartisan Stupak-Pitts language. Instead,
Reid has sought to please the militant minority that
demands funding of abortion through federal programs,
even though substantial majorities of Americans believe
that abortion should be excluded from government-funded
and government-sponsored health programs.
The Reid bill establishes a big new
federal health insurance program, the public option
(although now referred to in Reid's bill as the
"community health insurance option"). The bill
authorizes (on page 118) the federal Secretary of Health
and Human Services to require coverage of any and all
abortions throughout the public option program. This
would be federal government funding of abortion, no
matter how hard they try to disguise it.
In addition, the bill creates new
tax-supported subsidies to purchase private health plans
that will cover abortion on demand.
National Right to Life will continue to
fight for the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, and to oppose the
stubborn attempts of congressional Democratic leaders to
establish new federal government programs that will fund
coverage of elective abortions.
For extensive further documentation on
the Stupak-Pitts Amendment and other aspects of the
issue, visit the NRLC website at
www.nrlc.org/ahc
To go to the Abortion in Health Care
index, click here.
To go to the NRLC Home page, click
here.
To go to the NRLC Legislative Action Center, click
here.
|