|
To go to the Abortion in Health Care
index, click here.
To go to the NRLC Home page, click
here.
To go to the NRLC Legislative Action Center, click
here.
To
view or download a copy of this update in the PDF
format, click
here
(requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).
For immediate release:
Saturday, March 13, 2010
For further information:
National
Right to Life Committee (NRLC)
Federal Legislation Department, 202-626-8820
Communications Department, 202-626-8825
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE (NRLC) UPDATE ON HEALTH
CARE LEGISLATION
U.S.
HOUSE TO VOTE WITHIN DAYS ON WHETHER TO MAKE
PRO-ABORTION SENATE HEALTH BILL "THE LAW OF THE LAND,"
AS HOUSE MEMBERS STUDY COMMUNICATIONS FROM NATIONAL
RIGHT TO LIFE, U.S. CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, AND
OTHERS
WASHINGTON -- In a significant
development this week,
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.)
made it clear that the House
Democratic Leadership will force a vote soon on the
Senate-passed health bill (H.R. 3590), including
multiple abortion-related provisions strongly opposed by
the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) and other
pro-life organizations, and will not include pro-life
language in any followup legislation.
In
addition, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) intends to
go forward on the basis, reportedly articulated by the
Senate parliamentarian, that H.R. 3590 must be enacted
into law before the Senate can consider any followup
bill under fast-track "reconciliation" procedures. The
Washington Post
reported (March 13), "Pelosi shrugged off the ruling,
accepting that the Senate bill would have to move first,
and independently. 'It isn't going to make any
difference except maybe in the mood that people are in,'
she said Friday. 'The fact is that once we pass it
[H.R. 3590] in the House, it's going to be the law of
the land."
House members have received a March 5
memorandum from NRLC, posted
here, which
summarizes NRLC substantive objections to multiple
provisions of the Senate bill, and sketches the
political implications of the upcoming roll call. NRLC
said in part: "When all of the pro-abortion provisions
are considered in total, the Senate bill is the most
pro-abortion single piece of legislation that has ever
come to the House floor for a vote, since
Roe v. Wade.
Any House member who votes for the Senate health bill is
casting a career-defining pro-abortion vote. A House
member who votes for the Senate bill would forfeit a
plausible claim to pro-life credentials. No House
member who votes for the Senate bill will be regarded,
in the future, as having a record against federal
funding of abortion. All of those statements are true
regardless of how many assurances or denials are
disseminated by President Obama or by Speaker Pelosi,
both of whom have sought throughout their political
careers to undermine limits on government funding of
abortion. House members who vote for the Senate bill
will be accountable to their constituents for what the
Senate bill contains."
On March 12, the U.S. Conference of
Catholic Bishops disseminated to congressional offices
a four-page memorandum
titled, "What's Wrong With the Senate Health Care Bill
on Abortion? A Response to Professor Jost." This
memorandum is a concise and cogent rebuttal to one
recent tendentious attempt to minimize the multiple ways
in which the Senate bill departs, in the pro-abortion
direction, from the principles of current law and from
the substance of the abortion-related provisions adopted
by the House last year (especially the Stupak-Pitts
Amendment). The memo explains how provisions of the
Senate bill would result in direct federal funding of
elective abortions, federal subsidies for plans that
cover elective abortions (including some federally
administered plans), and authority for federal officials
to mandate inclusion of abortion coverage in private
plans. It also notes that the Senate bill lacks the
vital abortion nondiscrimination language (the so-called
"Weldon" provision) found in the House-passed health
bill. The USCCB memo is posted
here.
On March 11, the public policy arm of the
Southern Baptist Convention issued
a national alert,
urging citizens to contact their representatives in the
House to urge the defeat of the Senate bill.
The results of
polls conducted very recently in 12 congressional
districts by the polling companyTM, inc./WomanTrend,
dealing with the abortion-related aspects of the health
care debate, are posted
here.
Additional resources on the
abortion-related controversies surrounding H.R. 3590 are
posted on the NRLC website
here.
NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson
and Senior Legislative Counsel Susan Muskett are
available to discuss these issues with bona fide
journalists. Please contact the NRLC Communications
Department at (202) 626-8825 or the Federal Legislation
Department at (202) 626-8820 to arrange an interview.
To go to the Abortion in Health Care
index, click here.
To go to the NRLC Home page, click
here.
To go to the NRLC Legislative Action Center, click
here. |